Happy Birthday Chipalato

Countess Of Chester.
Critical baby monitor at Lucy Letby Hospital, was not working during the spike.

This was NOT mentioned at the Letby Trial

https://justice-miscarrage.co.uk/news-details/14

Lucy Letby Appoint a new barrister - Mark McDonald

https://justice-miscarrage.co.uk/project-details/1

The question of whether Lucy Letby, the former neonatal nurse convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder others, is innocent is one of great controversy and complexity. As of her conviction, Letby has been found guilty in a court of law based on the evidence presented during a lengthy and high-profile trial in the UK.

Key Points Regarding the Case:
The Conviction: Letby was convicted of multiple counts of murder and attempted murder related to the deaths and harm of babies in the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital. The trial relied on a combination of circumstantial evidence, medical testimony, and an analysis of patterns in the incidents that occurred while she was on shift.

Circumstantial Evidence: The case against Letby was largely built on circumstantial evidence, such as the fact that the incidents only occurred when she was on duty. There was no direct forensic evidence, such as eyewitness accounts or video recordings, linking her to the crimes, which leads some to question the strength of the conviction.

Doubts and Controversy: Some observers, including a minority of medical professionals and legal commentators, have raised doubts about the robustness of the evidence. They argue that neonatal units deal with fragile and critically ill babies, and the possibility of natural or systemic causes for the deaths should not be overlooked. Furthermore, they have suggested that the investigation might have focused too heavily on Letby, potentially overlooking other explanations.

Medical Testimonies and Scientific Uncertainty: There are concerns over the reliability of some medical evidence, especially in cases involving complex health conditions of pre-term infants. Experts disagree over some of the conclusions drawn by medical professionals during the trial.

Next Steps in the Legal Process: While Letby has been convicted, the case may still go through further legal processes, such as appeals. Appeals could focus on potential missteps during the trial, the interpretation of the evidence, or the introduction of new evidence. Until those legal processes are completed, her case may remain subject to debate.

Is Lucy Letby Innocent?
At this point, Letby has been convicted of the crimes and is serving a sentence based on that conviction. However, the question of innocence is still debated in the public sphere, with some maintaining that the evidence does not conclusively prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Until an appeal or new evidence presents a significant shift in the understanding of the case, the legal system has determined her guilt. However, doubts and differing opinions mean that the question of her innocence or guilt remains unresolved for some people outside the courtroom.

In summary, while Lucy Letby has been found guilty by a court, the debate over her innocence persists in the public and professional domains, and only time, further legal processes, or new evidence could alter the final verdict.

Lucy Letby lawyer: "Anger needs to be pointed in a different direction" if conviction is not "safe"

75,621 views 8 Sept 2024 #timesradio
"[The families] have a right to be angry...if no crime is actually committed, then their anger needs to be pointed in a different direction."

Lucy Letby's barrister Mark McDonald outlines why he is challenging her conviction on #timesradio

Lucy Letby's conviction was 'unsafe' due to 'misleading data'

67,423 views 4 Sept 2024
"I'm concerned that the conviction might not be safe."

Professor Jane Hutton says the evidence presented in Lucy Letby's prosecution was "misleading."

Sir David Davis: It's 'Highly Probable' Lucy Letby Is Innocent